No doubt many technologies have entered the market in recent times and Bitbucket and Docker are becoming the major topic of debate. Bitbucket is an essential introduction in the “Code Collaboration and Version Control “category of tech stacks whereas Docker is identified under the category of “Virtual Machine Platforms and Containers”. Both these recent technology introductions have created a buzz so let us discuss them both in detail with their differences.
Understanding Bitbucket and Docker
Bitbucket developers see it as one place to plan projects, collaborate, test, and deploy the codes without the need for any private repositories. It allows the team to make the best use of superior Jira integration that is built-in CI/CD and is free for a maximum of 5 users. Thus, “free private repos, simple setup, and smart UI tools are the key factors that make developers choose Bitbucket.
Docker which is considered the Enterprise container platform for high-velocity innovation has emerged as the industry-leading container platform. It supports high–velocity innovation and enables organizations to build and share smart applications securely. As a result, Docker is chosen for its integrated developer tools, shareable & reusable apps, and open & portable images along with rapid integration. Thus, Docker is an open-source tool with 15.6K GitHub forks and 54k GitHub stars.
Key Differences between Bitbucket and Docker
Let’s understand the different features and use cases of Bitbucket and Docker to understand the suitability of both these tech stacks for distinct projects.
Some Companies using Bitbucket and Docker
A few companies that use Bitbucket tech stacks are CRED, Accenture, Getir, Hepisburada, Atolye 15, Circle Ci, and a lot more. On the contrary popular companies that have incorporated Docker in their operations are Pininterest, Shopify, Udemy, Spotify, Robinhood, Twitter, etc.
Pros and Cons of Bitbucket and Docker
| PROS | CONS | |
|---|---|---|
| Bitbucket | ● Simple Setup
● Free Repositories ● Affordable Git Hosting ● Nice UI and tools |
● CI tool is not free
● Not much community activity ● Operated by Enterprise Java Company ● UI may be confusing at times |
| Docker | ● Open source
● Rapid Integration ● Lightweight ● Better testability and reproducibility |
● Weak documentation syncing
● Unreliable networking ● Contains few broken features ● Relatively less secure |
Common Tools that integrate with Bitbucket and Docker
● Bitbucket: Git , Docker , Slack , npm , Trello , Jira ,etc
● Docker: Java, Bitbucket, Kubernetes, Docker Compose, Virtual box, Ansible etc.
Thus, it can be observed that both Bitbucket and Docker can be integrated with each other effectively to give better results, than the other tools.
Other Features of Bitbucket and Docker
| Feature | Bitbucket | Docker |
|---|---|---|
| Best Suitability | Product Teams and Software Developers | All business organizations irrespective of the size |
| Deployment | Cloud Saas Web –based , Windows, Linux | Cloud Saas Web –based , Windows, Linux , & Mac too |
| Support | Email /Help Desk and Chat | Email /Help Desk, FAQs /Forums and Chat |
Final Words
As per the reports of the Stack share community, Docker is seen to have broader approval where it is mentioned by around 3527 company stacks and 3448 developers while Bitbucket is listed only with 1750 company stacks so far and 1494 developer stacks which is comparatively lower than Docker. However, it does not make Bitbucket any less there are specific projects where it suits the best and has enormous potential.
The final choice relies on the developers who are apt with these tech stacks and know what works best for the project. So make sure to have the best team of developers who understand project requirements well. So, find the best team of expert and experienced team of developers for your project at www.centrelocus.com .
